加载中…
个人资料
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:
  • 博客访问:
  • 关注人气:
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:

全世界的黄金仅有长宽高各67立方英尺

(2011-05-11 09:20:33)
标签:

巴菲特

美国

b6

《财富》杂志

埃克森美孚

财经

分类: 财经摘选

中国经济网又一扯淡数字:全世界的黄金仅有67立方英尺(约2立方米),超级弱智错误

经济 2010-10-28 12:06:44 阅读240 评论0   字号: 订阅

黄金比重为19.32,则全世界黄金体积为16.3万吨/19.32=0.84万方,也就是说有8400立方米黄金,再看看中国经经济网是怎么说的:我不知道是巴菲特犯混还是中国经济网把人家说的东西给翻译错了,总之全球黄金只有2立方米是一个弱智级的错误。看看哪个大银行里不存上几方的黄金,怎么全世界就只有两方了呢?

 又以buffet, gold, fortune为关键词找到了巴氏的有的原话,附在后面, "You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction."显然是译错了,人家说的是长宽高各67英尺的立方体,一米等于3.28英尺,则67/3.28=20.42米。

20.42X20.42X20.42=8514立方米,与按上数据算出的8400立方米有些出入,但大数相同。

 

世界黄金协会统计,目前全球地上黄金存量为16.3万吨,其中首饰用金占最大比重,达到8.36万吨;黄金个人投资量达到2.73万吨;各国黄金官方储备总量达2.87万吨;工业和其他用金量达到1.97万吨,其余仍有数千吨为不确定去向,如黄金制品随同沉船沉入海底等。而且,目前全球已确认的地下存金量为2.6万吨左右,以目前黄金开采速度,可供开采10年左右。http://stock.sohu.com/20100118/n269663419.shtml

 

 巴菲特:当前黄金市场泡沫太大了http://finance.ce.cn/rolling/201010/28/t20101028_16361671.shtml

  早报讯 美国加州佩铂代因大学法学院教授、经济学家、节目主持人本·斯泰因近日对沃伦巴菲特进行了专访。他在《财富》杂志中撰文指出,巴菲特对黄金泡沫表示了担忧。

  坐在巴菲特办公室的沙发里,斯泰因的第一问题就是:“黄金怎么样?这是一个经典的泡沫呢,还是什么?”

  “瞧,你可以把世界上所有已经开采的黄金堆起来,也就是一个不到67立方英尺(约2立方米)的金属块。按照目前的金价,这个金属块可以换全部的美国耕地,再加10个埃克森美孚,再加上1万亿美元现金。你愿意选哪一个?谁能产生更多价值?”巴菲特带着一贯自信的微笑如此回答。

  谈及是否真正实现经济复苏,巴菲特毫不迟疑:“没错,经济是在复苏。尽管复苏的进程缓慢,但的确是在复苏。我们正从伯灵顿北方铁路调遣回一部分人,尽管目前还只允许一些人涉足其他行业,但我们看到了美国运通和BNSF货运汽车装载业务正在复苏。纵观我们涉足的业务,能看见缓慢复苏的迹象。”

  对于未来的就业形势,巴菲特表示:“(招聘)需求已经显现,并将很快回升。2008年秋天,我们需要大规模刺激政策,但是我们没有得到。美国银行在美林大概只值29美分的时候以29美元的价格买下它,这是一个奇迹。假如这件事情没有发生,一切都会崩溃。整个商业票据市场都将停摆,多米诺骨牌将纷纷倒下。伯克希尔是最后倒下的那一块,但最终还是会倒下。肯·刘易斯(Ken Lewis)一度挽救了整个体系,直到问题资产救助计划最终奏效。但是现在,我们将进入非常缓慢的恢复期,因为人们依旧恐慌。但是毫无疑问的是,我们在复苏中。”

  对于当前的楼市,巴菲特认为,楼市的复苏还有很长的路要走。这个市场偏离平衡太远,需要很长时间才能得以修正。

  谈到美国的财政政策,巴菲特认为应该对真正的美国富人征收更多赋税,他特意指出,这里是指那些年收入为500万美元,特别是10亿美元的那些人。

  巴菲特称:“如果谁的儿子或孙子在阿富汗,我肯定给予他高利率的豁免权。我在这类会议上见过许多富人、亿万富翁,他们中却没有一个人的家人在战场。”(东方早报)

 

 

Warren Buffett: Forget gold, buy stocks

http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/18/pf/investing/buffett_ben_stein.fortune/index.htm

FORTUNE -- The first thing I notice on my most recent visit with Warren E. Buffett, who recently turned 80, is how incredible he looks. He would look terrific for 50; for 80, he looks like Charles Atlas. He's modest about it, as he is about everything. "It all works great," he says. "The eyes, the hearing -- everything works great ... which it will until it all falls apart."

The second thing you notice is that he is so smart it curls your hair.

My first question, as I sit there on the couch in his office, is: "What about gold? Is this a classic bubble or what?"

"Look," he says, with his usual confident laugh. "You could take all the gold that's ever been mined, and it would fill a cube 67 feet in each direction. For what that's worth at current gold prices, you could buy all -- not some -- all of the farmland in the United States. Plus, you could buy 10 Exxon Mobils, plus have $1 trillion of walking-around money. Or you could have a big cube of metal. Which would you take? Which is going to produce more value?"

Okay, so gold is not a screaming buy to Buffett. What should a typical upper-middle-class person in the U.S. buy to prepare for retirement?

"Equities," Buffett answers without a moment's hesitation.

"The VTI?" I ask.

"That's good enough. Maybe a selection of high-dividend-paying stocks that are likely to raise their dividends. Maybe the top 100 dividend payers of the S&P 500."

Then, after a second's thought, he adds, "Well, maybe not that, but equities."

On the $64,000 question -- whether the recovery was real -- Buffett has no doubt. "Yes," he says, "it's a recovery. It's a slow recovery, but it's a recovery. We're calling back some people at Burlington Northern. We are still letting a few go in other businesses, but we see a pickup in business of heavy users of American Express (AXP, Fortune 500), in freight car loadings at BNSF -- across our businesses, we see slow recovery."

"When would you start hiring a lot more people?" I ask him.

"When demand picks up," he says. "We don't hire because we get a tax break or because someone in the government tells us to. We hire when there's more demand for what we are making or moving or selling. It's that simple."

"Where will the demand come from if a business as big as yours is being so cautious?" I ask.

"It's already coming," he says. "It's already happening, and it will pick up. Look," he adds, "we needed a really big stimulus in the fall of 2008 -- a really, really big stimulus. We didn't get it. It was a miracle that Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) bought Merrill for $29 when it was probably worth 29 cents if left on its own for a few days. If that hadn't happened, everything would have collapsed. The whole commercial-paper market would have stopped. Every domino would have fallen. Berkshire (BRKA, Fortune 500) would have been the last, but it would have fallen too. Ken Lewis saved the whole system for a while, until TARP could rescue it. But now we're just going to get a very slow recovery because people are still scared. But we are seeing recovery, definitely."

"How about in housing?"

"That recovery is still a long way off. That market got way out of equilibrium, and it's going to take a long while for it to get fixed."

Buffett goes into his life and childhood, but I don't see how we can make any money out of that, so I will leave that part out.

What about taxes? Buffett thinks that taxes should be raised on really rich Americans -- ones making $5 million a year, say, and especially ones making $1 billion a year.

"Why would we want to do that" I ask, "if we have a fiscal policy that is explicitly about running large deficits?"

The three of us -- Buffett, my colleague Phil deMuth,and I -- talked for a long time about the size of the deficits relative to "normal peacetime" and World War II, when they were far higher than they are even now. Then Buffett sums up his feelings about it, saying his wish to raise taxes on the very rich is really about social justice more than about fiscal policy.

"I would give anyone an exemption from the higher rates if he had a son or grandson in Afghanistan," he said. "I meet a lot of people at these conferences of rich people, of billionaires," he said. "None of them have anyone in their family in combat."

We talk awhile longer, and then Phil and Warren and I go out for a memorable Italian meal at Piccolo Pete's, which Warren considers the best restaurant in America. I look at him as he chews his meatballs. (He has perfect table manners.)

"This guy is so smart -- it's like he's a machine, but a very friendly, polite, affable machine," I think.

I keep thinking of what I would do if I had even the tiniest fraction of his money. But I never will, so I'll skip that too.

Buffett drives us back to the hotel in his lovely Cadillac. "I bought it because a couple of years ago I saw Congress giving Rick Wagoner (the former CEO of GM) such a going-over that I thought I should help him out by buying a Cadillac."

"Cadillac," I think, remembering an old Bob Dylan song. "Good car to drive, after a war."

0

阅读 收藏 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  

新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 欢迎批评指正

新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 产品答疑

新浪公司 版权所有