[转载]英语阅读理解之作者态度
(2013-11-11 17:23:47)
标签:
转载 |
分类: 英语语言和文化 |
英语阅读理解之作者态度
做题方法:1.找作者直接评价语句 ;2.找表达感情色彩的形容词、动词、副词。
一
支持,赞同,乐观
一支持,赞同,乐观positive. adj/favorable
adj.赞成的,
有利的,
赞许的,
良好的/approve of /approval n.
赞成,
承认,
正式批准 /enthusiasm
二客观,中立(即好的坏的都说,选的可能性极大)
objective adj.客观的
neutral adj.中立的
impartial adj.公平的,
不偏不倚的
disinterested adj.无私的
imprejudiced adj.没有偏见的
unbiased adj.没有偏见的
unprejudiced adj.公平的,
无偏见的,
没有成见的 moderate中等的,适度的,
不偏激的
impersonal adj.非个人的 factual adj.事实的, 实际的,根据事实的 mixed喜忧参半的
三反对、批评、怀疑、悲观
negative adj.否定的,
消极的,
负的,
阴性的/disapproval
不赞成 objection
异议
opposition
反对 critical
批评的 criticism
批评批判 disgust vi.令人厌恶,
令人反感vt.使作呕
warning警告的
/compromising妥协的;让步的doubt/doubtful/suspicious可疑的,
怀疑的/ suspicion n. /question/puzzling
adj.使迷惑的,
使莫明其妙的/depressed
消沉的/unconcerned不关心的
四
作者个人情绪
subjective adj.主观的,
个人的indifferent
漠不关心的/indifference n.不关心
tolerance n.宽容,容忍,忍受
pessimism n.悲观,
悲观主义pessimistic
悲观的 gloomy adj.黑暗的,
阴沉的,
令人沮丧的,
阴郁的 optimistic adj.乐观的
sensitive
有感觉的,
敏感[锐]的,易受伤害的
scared adj.恐惧的
reserved adj.保留的,有保留的
moderate adj.中等的,
适度的,
适中的v.缓和
mild adj.温和的,
温柔的,
淡味的,
轻微的,
适度的 ironic adj.说反话的,
讽刺的 confused adj.困惑的,
烦恼的 amazed adj.吃惊的,
惊奇的 worried / concerned adj.关心的,
有关的 apprehensive adj.担忧,担心
mixed
喜忧参半 biased
有偏见的
五
有些选项是永远不能作为正确答案的:indifferent subjective biased
puzzling
(第一篇)Why isn’t your newspaper reporting any good news? All I read about is murder, bribery(行贿), and death. Frankly, I am sick of all this bad news.
This author’s attitude towards the newspaper reporting is to______.
A.complain
(第二篇)We find that our students don’t read and look down upon reading and even scold those of us who teach it. All they want to do is watch TV. Therefore, I have reached a conclusion: “Let them watch it!” If television is much more attractive to children than books, why should we fight it? Let them watch all they want!
What do you think is the author’s attitude towards TV?
A.
Curious.
(第三篇)Now and again I have had horrible dreams,
but not enough of them make me lose my delight in dreams. To begin
with, I like the idea of dreaming of going to bed and lying still
and then, by some astonishing magic, wandering into another kind of
existence. As a child, I could never understand why grown-ups took
dreaming so calmly when they could make such a fuss
(大惊小怪) about any holiday. This still
puzzles me. I am puzzled by people who say they never dream and
appear to have no interest in the subject. It is much more
astonishing than it would be if they said they never went out for a
walk. Most people do not seem to accept dreaming as part of their
lives. They appear to see it as an annoying little habit, like
sneezing (打喷嚏). I can never understand this. My
dream life does not seem as important as my waking life because
there is far less of it, but to me it is important.
A. He likes it.
2. The writer suggests that people who say they never go out for a walk are _____.
A.
interesting
4
On the first day of my visit, we went out with one
of my father's friends for lunch at an outdoor café. We walked
along that afternoon, did some shopping, ate at the street table,
and lauded over my son's funny facial expressions. Gone was my
father's critical(挑剔的) air and strict rules. Who was this
person I knew as my father, who seemed so friendly and
interesting to be around? What had held him back
before?
58. What does the author think of her father after her visit to Tucson?
A. More critical. B. More talkative. C. Gentle and friendly. D. Strict and hard-working.
5(2011·重庆卷)C
Getting rid of dirt, in the opinion of most people, is a good thing. However, there is nothing fixed about attitudes to dirt.
In the early 16th century, people thought that dirt on the skin was a means to block out disease, as medical opinion had it that washing off dirt with hot water could open up the skin and let ills in. A particular danger was thought to lie in public baths. By 1538, the French king had closed the bath houses in his kingdom. So did the king of England in 1546. Thus began a long time when the rich and the poor in Europe lived with dirt in a friendly way. Henry IV, King of France, was famously dirty. Upon learning that a nobleman had taken a bath, the king ordered that, to avoid the attack of disease, the nobleman should not go out.
Though the belief in the merit of dirt was long-lived, dirt has no longer been regarded as a nice neighbor ever since the 18th century. Scientifically speaking, cleaning away dirt is good to health. Clean water supply and hand washing are practical means of preventing disease. Yet, it seems that standards of cleanliness have moved beyond science since World War Ⅱ. Advertisements repeatedly sell the idea: clothes need to be whiter than white, cloths ever softer, surfaces to shine. Has the hate for dirt, however, gone too far?
Attitudes to dirt still differ hugely nowadays. Many first-time parents nervously try to warn their children off touching dirt, which might be responsible for the spread of disease. On the contrary, Mary Ruebush, an American immunologist(免疫学家),encourages children to play in the dirt to build up a strong immune system. And the latter position is gaining some ground.
64. The kings of France and England in the
16th century closed bath houses because
B. they thought bath houses were too dirty to stay in
C. they believed disease could be spread in public baths
D. they considered bathing as the cause of skin disease
65.Which of the following best describes Henry IV’s attitude to bathing?
A. Afraid.
66. How does the passage mainly develop?A.
By providing examples.
67. What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?
A. To stress the role of dirt.
C. To call attention to the danger of dirt.D. To present the change of views on dirt.
6
The fridge is considered a necessity. It
has been so since the 1960s when packaged food first appeared with
the label: “store in the refrigerator.”
In my fridgeless Fifties childhood, I was fed well and healthily.
The milkman came daily; the grocer, the butcher(肉商), the baker, and the ice-cream man
delivered two or three times, a week. The Sunday meat would last
until Wednesday and surplus(剩余的) bread and milk became all kinds of
cakes. Nothing was wasted, and we were never troubled by rotten
food. Thirty years on, food deliveries have ceased, fresh
vegetables are almost unobtainable in the
country.
The invention of the fridge
contributed comparatively little to the art of food preservation. A
vast way of well-tried techniques already existed----natural
cooling, drying, smoking, salting, sugaring, bottling….
What refrigeration did promote was
marketing----marketing hardware and electricity, marketing soft
drinks, marketing dead bodies of animals around the globe in search
of a good price.
Consequently, most of the world’s
fridges are to be found, not in the tropics where they might prove
useful, but in the wealthy countries with mild temperatures where
they are climatically almost unnecessary. Every winter, millions of
fridges hum away continuously, and at vast expense, busily
maintaining an artificially-cooled space inside an
artificially-heated house----while outside, nature provides the
desired temperature free of charge.
The fridge’s effect upon the environment has been evident, while
its contribution to human happiness has been insignificant. If you
don’t believe me, try it yourself, invest in a food cabinet and
turn off your fridge next winter. You may miss the
hamburgers(汉堡包), but at least you’ll get rid of
that terrible hum.
1. Why does the author say that nothing
was wasted before the invention of fridges?
2. Who benefited the least from fridges
according to the author?
3. What is the author’s overall attitude toward fridges?