China may lose control of its food supply if it relies on
foreign genetically modified (GM) crops, a think-tank and ecologist
warned.
Through monopoly status, foreign suppliers can raise seed prices
and drive hundreds of millions of Chinese farmers bankrupt and
trigger social unrest, the China Business News (CBN) reported
Monday, citing Jiang Gaoming, an ecologist at the Institute of
Botany under the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
China should draw lessons from the impact of foreign GM soybeans,
and must control foreign GM seeds entering the Chinese market,
Jiang was quoted as saying by the CBN.
China went from a major soybean producer to the largest soybean
importer in 2002 when it abolished an import quota and tariff on
soybeans. China imported a total of 42.6 million tons of soybeans
in 2009, up 14 percent over 2008. Chinese customs data shows 97.4
percent of the soybeans were imported from the US, Brazil and
Argentina.
Four international grain dealers, ADM, Bunge, Cargill and Louis
Dreyfus, had acquired 64 out of 90 China cooking oil processors
using soybeans by 2008.
So far there is no scientific proof of the potential harm of
genetically modified food. But genetic modification can't
necessarily contribute to an increase in crop output, said Fang
Lifeng, director of Greenpeace's agriculture and food
program.
Some GM cotton shows "minor" problems at the seventh year of
planting, said Du Jianjun, manager of a seeding company based in
Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Fang said that genetically modified cotton can resist bollworms but
is vulnerable to other kind of pests, which leads to increased
costs for other pesticides and pollution after years of planting,
based on Greenpeace's field visit to cotton farmers in Yancheng,
Jiangsu Province.
Unlike the US and Argentina where large farm areas are suited for
the use of machinery, much of China's farmland is scattered, and
herbicide-resistant GM crops don't save costs for Chinese
farmers.
"Genetically modified seeds are normally priced two to four times
more than non-genetically modified seeds, eroding farmers' income,"
Fang said.
So far only two GM crops, cotton and papaya, are allowed to be
planted in China, Fang said. He added that the Ministry of
Agriculture last November granted safety certificates to two types
of GM rice and one type of GM corn without giving information on
food and environmental safety, or the timetable for final
commercialization of the GM crops.
That has sparked concern as rice is the major staple food in China
and the country will be the first to have a major food genetically
modified, Fang said.
Genetically modified technology in grain might play an important
role in China's grain output, as China is short of arable land,
said Weng Ming, a researcher at the Institute of Rural Development
of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
The Chinese government encourages independently developed
genetically modified agricultural products, the central government
wrote in an agricultural policy document released in January.
The two types of GM rice given safety certification involve 10-12
patents of foreign seed companies such as Monsanto, which has more
than 80 percent of the market share of genetically modified seeds
worldwide, Fang said. He said these patents may remain free during
scientific research, but once commercialized, the foreign patent
owners might manipulate the price of seeds through technology
transfers to seed wholesalers, causing rice price hikes and social
impacts.
If it relies on imports, China might lose control of its own food
supply, Fang noted.
By Wang Xinyuan
Source: Global Times