标签:
小额信贷微型金融日内瓦论坛microfinanceinchina财经 |
分类: 小额信贷与普惠金融 |
Networks and Cooperation Patterns of Microfinance in China
By Bai Chengyu, Division Director of CICETE
Email: baichengyu@cicete.org
A. Definition and Categories of Networks
1. The networks listed in this paper are those organizations that have following characteristics:
a) The network is not one organization with branches but a group of organizations that are legally independent
b) They have the common vision, common purpose or common interests
c) They have certain kind of coordination mechanism or unified
management system based on an agreement or
understanding
2. The networks will be introduced in this paper by following categories in accordance with Chinese context:
a) Networks at the industry level
b) Networks of NGOs
c) Networks of commercial banks or companies
B. China Association of Microfinance (CAM), the Network at the industry level
1. History
In 2003, the representatives from more than 100 domestic MFIs (mostly NGO-type MFIs) attended the China Microfinance Summit sponsored by the Ford Foundation and the Citi Foundation. The participants appealed to the establishment for an association of the microfinance organizations in China. After this Summit, the Rural Development Institute (hereinafter referred to as RDI) of the China Academy of Social Sciences (hereinafter referred to as CASS, the earliest institution devoted to the experimentation of microfinance in China), together with China International Center for Economic & Technical Exchanges (hereinafter referred to as CICETE, the manager of the largest Microfinance program in China) and the Development Department of All-China Women Federation (hereinafter referred to as ACWF) as well as China
Foundation of Poverty Alleviation (CFPA) decided to jointly initiate and set up the China Association of Microfinance.
According to Chinese regulations regarding the management of NGOs, any association should be subordinate to one governmental department. Therefore, the Ministry of Commerce (hereinafter referred to as MOFCOM) imparted its strong support in this regard and agreed to uphold the establishment of this association. Later on, CICETE, the RDI of CASS and the Development Department of ACWF organized the preparation committee for the association, and submitted the application to the Ministry of Civil Affairs (hereinafter referred to as MOCA) via the MOFCOM.
In 2004, the Citi Foundation provided a five-year project through CASS to support the establishment of CAM.
In November of 2005, CAM was created oat the China Microfinance Development Conference in Beijing, at which more than 100 MFIs that joined this conference unanimously passed the constitution and proclamation of CAM. They also elected the Administrative Committee and the Standing Committee and appointed the secretary-general of CAM. Representatives from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the central bank, and the MOCA attended the conference to show their support. After the conference, the secretariat of the CAM formally began to function by making use of the facilities of both CICETE and CASS. The main part of the Secretariat is housed under CICETE.
CAM has 110 members at present, in which most are the NGO style MFIs, while two commercial banks and two microcredit companies. CFPA finally withdrew from CAM.
2. Partners
2.1 Citi Foundation, the main donor
2.2 UNDP and other international organizations have seats in the Advisory Committee representing donors and TA providers
2.3 GT, strategic cooperator and donor
2.4 PBC, CBRC, MOFCOM and other government line agencies, regulators and policy makers
2.5 Ford Foundation, GF-USA, Planet Finance and other international NGOs, donors and TA providers
2.6 SEEP Network: TA provider
2.7 CASS/CICETE: provide administrative support and subsidies
2.8 All members
3. Purpose (function) of network/cooperation
3.1 Policy dialogue and promotion
3.2 Self-discipline
3.3 Information exchange
3.4 Technical support and training
3.5 Fund raising services
4. Performance (achievements)
4.1 Policy Dialogue and Promotion:
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.2 Self-regulation:
-
-
4.3 Technical Assistance and Training:
-
-
-
4.4 Information Exchange and Advocacy:
-
-
-
-
-
4.5 Fundraising Service:
-
-
5. Challenges
5.1 Legal status: has not yet been registered at present, as most of its members are illegal financial institutes
5.2 Ownership: The members need not pay membership fees because CAM has not registered yet
5.3 Governance: Although CASS has its Administrative Committee, CASS and CICETE are the actual decision makers and supervisors for CAM
5.4 Resources of funds: CAM is depending on a grant from the Citi Foundation
5.5 Capacity: Constrained by the above problems, CAM cannot provide all the required services to its members and its contributions to the entire industry are also limited