今天在新闻上看到一则报道美国最大的乳腺癌患者协会的CEO（首席执行官）年收入为六十八万四千美元，可该组织的年收入才三亿四千万美，红十字协会CEO年薪五十万美元，而该组织年收入为三十四亿美元。若不是该组织收入大大降低，使得一些接受该组织资助的研究医疗部门因为没有按时得到资金而抱怨的话，首席执行官的高工资也不会曝光。该组织年收入只有红十字协会的十分之一，可头头的工资却比红十字头头工资还高，简直不可思议！！所谓一个慈善机构，既不生产，也不贡献，只不过进行组织管理与分配，不像做生意要面对残酷的商业竞争，产品更新换代问题，这个最高管理人员怎么能得到如此高的报酬呢？说白了就是合法的变相贪污大家的捐款，幸好不是我的。

    补充：美国还有一种变相贪污，那就是有钱人把钱捐给慈善机构，他们成为慈善机构里面的重要领导人，甚至儿女们也成为慈善机构里面的重要人物，儿女们在里面什么也不做，每个月按时领取高额报酬，同时这些有钱人因为捐助了慈善机构而享受政府的免税以及其他福利待遇，通过这种方式变相合法偷税漏税。这就是美国的变相腐败，通过钻法律空子，变相合法达到个人目的。

附：

When the Susan G. Komen Foundation announced last week that it was canceling half of its 3-Day races next year, the charity blamed the economy. But it also acknowledged that its decision to stop providing funds to Planned Parenthood was a factor。

In early 2012, Komen announced it was pulling its grants for breast-cancer screenings from Planned Parenthood, drawing an immediate backlash from Komen supporters and abortion rights advocates. Within days, Nancy Brinker, the group’s founder and CEO, reversed the decision to defund the organization. Then, in August, Brinker announced that she would be stepping down.

But 10 months later, Brinker still holds her position and tax documents reveal that she received a 64 percent raise and now makes $684,000 a year, according to the charity’s latest available tax filing.  Komen says the raise came in November 2010, prior to last year’s controversy。

Ken Berger, president and CEO of Charity Navigator, which evaluates and rates charities, called Brinker’s salary “extremely high.”

“This pay package is way outside the norm," he said. "It's about a quarter of a million dollars more than what we see for charities of this size. ... This is more than the head of the Red Cross is making for an organization that is one-tenth the size of the Red Cross.”

The American Red Cross had revenue of about $3.4 billion, while Komen’s was about $340 million last year.  Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern makes $500,000, according to the most recent financial documents available for the charity.