VIRTUE is like a rich stone, best plain set; and surely virtue is best,
ina body that is comely ,though not of delicate features; and that hath
ratherdignity of presence, than beauty of aspect. Neither is it almost
seen,that very beautiful persons are otherwise of great virtue; as if
naturewere rather busy, not to err, than in labor to produce excellency.
And therefore they prove accomplished, but not of great spirit; and study
ratherbehavior, than virtue. But this holds not always: for Augustus
Caesar,Titus Vespasianus, Philip le Belle of France, Edward the Fourth
ofEngland, Alcibiades of Athens, Ismael the Sophy of Persia, were all
highand great spirits; and yet the most beautiful men of their times.
In beauty, that of favor, is more than that of color; and that of decent
andgracious motion, more than that of favor. That is the best part of
beauty,which a picture cannot express; no, nor the first sight of the
life. There is no excellent beauty, that hath not some strangeness in
theproportion. A man cannot tell whether Apelles, or Albert Durer, were
themore trifler; whereof the one, would make a personage by geometrical
proportions;the other, by taking the best parts out of divers faces, to
makeone excellent. Such personages, I think, would please nobody, but
thepainter that made them. Not but I think a painter may make a
in
rather
seen,
nature
rather
Caesar,
of
high
and
beauty,
life.
the
the
proportions;
make
the

加载中…