美国实际上缺少应付危机的手段
(2009-01-06 22:59:42)
标签:
杂谈 |
真实情况是:束手少策
庞中英
国内仅仅注意到保尔森和英国《金融时报》关于危机的原因的话,却忽略了他关于美国政府缺少应付危机的足够手段的话。这是一个重要的信息。我把他贴出来,加了自己的评语如下:
一边是摩拳擦掌、信誓旦旦、高调开出应付危机的支票即将上台总统奥巴马,一方面是即将下台不做美国财政部长的保尔森:原来美国缺少应付危机的手段。这不是让人更没有“信心”了嘛!但保尔森的可爱在于他的坦率。他不是个政客,而是个大商人,不过干了几天财政部长而已。运气不佳,倒霉,晦气,在他手上出了金融大危机,千秋功罪,还不知如何被人评说。但他接受记者采访,实事求是,一语道破天机:美国政府捉襟见肘,缺少应付危机的手段啊!即使强大为美国政府,其能力也不过如此,何况其它政府。奥巴马除了皮肤不同于布什外,到底还能拿出什么有力措施力挽狂澜?
见英国《金融时报》的报道:US lacked the tools to tackle crisis
By Krishna Guha in Washington
Published: December 30 2008 23:35 | Last updated: December 30 2008 23:35
The US government has had to battle the financial crisis without all the tools it required to do so effectively, Hank Paulson, the outgoing US Treasury Secretary has told the Financial Times.
In one of his last interviews before leaving office, Mr Paulson said “we’ve done all this without all of the authorities that a major nation like the US needs”.
He said that even after Congress in October approved the $700bn (€496bn) troubled asset relief program, the US still lacked tools such as an adequate special bankruptcy regime for non-bank financial firms.
“We’re dealing with something that is really historic and we haven’t had a playbook,” he said. “The reason it has been difficult is first of all, these excesses have been building up for many, many years. Secondly, we had a hopelessly outdated global architecture and regulatory authorities . . . in the US.”
However, Mr Paulson was upbeat about the progress that has been made since Tarp was passed and defended his decision to reallocate funds originally slated for asset purchase towards financing capital injections and supporting risky Federal Reserve lending programmes.
“People say banks aren’t lending enough,” he said. “I agree with them – banks aren’t lending enough. But there would be much less lending if the actions were not taken that were taken to increase the confidence in the banks.”
Mr Paulson said any future regulatory overhaul should emphasise “better and more effective” regulation. It also needed to make sure that infrastructures and powers were robust enough to allow large institutions to fail.
“The organisations [financial firms] cannot be too big or too interconnected to fail,” he said.