牛人张长太最近走火入魔了，他在研究“后相对论”！他那些破玩意我没有看明白，也不想看明白，但他本人（还有其他的一些疑似牛人）认为这玩意可以得不止一个诺贝尔奖！天啊，石破天惊。牛人说，到那时候他将斥巨资买一辆公共汽车，说是想坐哪个座位就坐哪个座位，且不用刷卡！由于俺帮他翻了几页英文，他已痛快的承诺俺也可以隔三差五的坐一次：）

    俺帮他写点英文并不说明他的英文不行，事实上他的ENGLISH是可以指导西人的，一如大学究辜鸿铭当年。他不亲自翻的原因有三：一，太忙。二，牛人的英语文学色彩过浓，怕搞理工的半文盲们理解不了，三，给俺个磨练的机会。

    说的有点不着调了，打住。其实这个成果据清华的几个人说可是非同小可，为了“以飨读者”，俺把一部分摘要放在这里，各位物理达人先瞅一瞅。不过这可是没有经过他本人同意的，所以大家认真看，最好保存下来，没准哪天张诺贝尔同志一不高兴，就不能再晒这文章了。牛人一旦发起飙来，连他自己都怕的，据说就象新浪的ADMINISTRATOR们一般厉害。
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Post-relativity
----Solution for Post-relativity Issues Based on
the Reducibility of Increasing Function

Abstract:  In Relativity, when Lorenz conversion factor was derived, there came 3 important deductions spontaneously: when in motion, the mass will be larger, the ruler will be shorter, and the time will be longer. In this paper, we suppose the above-mentioned deductions are correct, and based on this, we are going to study the other part of Relativity: when the motion stops, should the increased mass, shortened ruler, and the prolonged time keep unchanged or restore to the original state? We’d like to name these 3 questions as post-relativity problems. In fact, there are same questions in mathematics, and people had been discussing these questions ever since the Law of Relativity came into being----people always query the supporter of Relativity by using the twin effect, including Einstein himself. But the answers are not scientific: in fact they always sound like philosophic or diplomatic language. Otherwise people would not ask these kinds of questions time and time again for a whole century. Since the Law of Relativity was mathematical derivation based on physical modeling, so we have to employ the same method to answer the Post-relativity questions. In this paper, by using an increasing function with reducibility, we’ve reached important conclusions: the increase/decrease that arose from motion will be restored to its original state when the motion stops. This may not be a disappointing conclusion to people (including Einstein himself if he could be informed).

Keywords: Einstein, Relativity, Post-relativity, Reducibility of Increasing Function, Twin effect, Twin paradox

后相对论
——从函数的递增归元性看后相对论问题

    摘要：相对论在得出洛伦兹转换因子后，便自然有了三个重要的推论：在运动状态下，质量会增加，尺子会缩短，时间会延长——简称：尺短，时长和质增。本文的前提是假设这三个结论是正确的，而只讨论如下情况：即，相对论的后半部分：当运动停下来时，缩短的尺子和延长的寿命，以及增加的质量，是保留下来还是会回复原样。本文把这三个问题称为后相对论问题，并加以讨论。其实，后相对论问题在数学上是同一个问题，而且从相对论一诞生，人们就已经开始讨论这个问题了——人们习惯于拿孪生子问题来质疑相对论的支持者，其中包括爱因斯坦本人。然而，得到的回答从来没有让人们在心里满意过，这些回答要么是哲学性的，要么便更像是外交辞令，反正不是科学的。不然，一百年来人们不会反复发问这个问题。由于相对论是物理建模下的数学推导，所以对后相对论问题，我们还要使用原来的物理模型进而使用数学方法来最终给出答案。本文就是从数学的一种函数，并从其递增归元性，推出重要结论：所有在运动状态下减少的或增加的，在运动停下来时将恢复原样——这是一个令人(包括爱因斯坦，如果他老还能有知的话)未必扫兴的结论。
    关键词：爱因斯坦，相对论，后相对论，递增归元，孪生子悖论，孪生子佯谬

----------------------------------------------------------------------

    哈。。。牛就一个字, aha, bullish is just one word！