|
标签:杂谈 |
发布日期:2009年11月14日
|
第1页
《利用小黑!获取86.5元Win7正版升级光盘》 |
|
标签:杂谈 |
Our psychos are like objects of different characteristics. The same environmental input would contain and stimulate the same psychoforce. However, when works on psychos of different characteristics and stable condition, the same psychoforce will lead to different psychodynamic processes. In addition, hardly did the same psychoforce engender different new stable condition of psycho when the effect of it ends up.
Psychologists once discussed the impacts of genetic and environment on the psycho. Which one is more significant and decisive? In my opinion, we should concentrate on the consciousness, for the consciousness is the direct indicator of the psycho. The consciousness is not independent. Every new thought or idea should be based on existed concepts or new environmental inputs. Every current thought or idea should be based on former concepts and environmental inputs. Hence, there are no contradictions between the importance of impacts of genetic and environmen
|
标签:教育 |
Why psychologists failed to find such force? For psychologists focus their attentions on elements, structures, and functions of psycho. They defined what personality is, what intelligence is, what memory is, what thinking is, what emotion is, what perception is, even what consciousness is. How can we proof the existence of psycho? If it does exist, what does it rely on? Some scientists argue that it is the brain and neural system. Even so, if we cultivate and feed an advanced brain, along with the entire neural system, can we do psychological research on it? Absolutely not. As the connections of synaptic and nerve signals are phenomena, and till now we don’t know if they occur before or after the change or generation of certain psycho, they are not essential and inner causes of psychological phenomena or psychodynamic process. Newton established Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, which means that the foundation of classic physics is mathematic. In my view, accord
|
标签:教育 |
Can psychologists set up “mathematical principles of psychological philosophy”?
An article in Scientific American, October, 2008, left me a great impression. The author introduced Prof. Martin A. Nowak’s researches and his philosophy. Prof. Nowak demonstrated a view of evolution dynamics. The fundamental principles of this idealized scheme, he says, will hold true for any laboratory-based chemical system in which monomers self-assemble, “in the same way as Newton’s equations describe how any planet goes around the sun, and it doesn’t matter what that planet is made of,” Nowak explains. “Math helps us to see what the most crucial and interesting experiment is. It describes a chemical system that can be built, and once it’s built, you can watch the origin of evolution.”
From materialism’s point of view, material determines one’s consciousness. That is similar to the principle of physiology that structure determines function.
|
标签:杂谈 |
|
标签:杂谈 |
|
标签:杂谈 |
|
标签:杂谈 |
|
标签:杂谈 |
|
标签:教育 |