http://blog.sina.com.cn/caryouth[订阅]
个人资料
评论
读取中...
博文
issue 232(2008-05-07 08:40)

It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.

 

To most political leaders, the conflict of whether to reveal some information or to hush up them is often an eccential problem. People have a native rights to know what the government they elected was doing and about to do. So in most cases, people march and demonstrate not for the rights of living, but for the rights of knowing. To give one visible case: the revolt of 1789 France Revolution was somewhat caused by the lacking of information. However, withhold some information is necessary and sometime, desirable.

 

Every government, demoncratic or monoarchic, conceals information they do not want their people acknoledge, just as people need privacy, difference is that the  latter one is, at least, legaled and reasonable, while the former one, especially the governments elected by the people, is somewhat

Revised Issue 1(2008-04-09 23:14)
 For the last three centuries, the world have changed a lot. In both oriental and occiental world, empirors been vanquished, hierarchy vanished, as well as the coming of science, freedom and  reforms. Question is who accomplished all of these, who gained the avalanche victories of everything. Is it those who were concerned with their own repuitations, intended to be more renowned according to processing a reform, or those who were willing to be viewed with disdain saw the corruption and dark side of the society, nobely acted on them and accidentaly be regarde as saints? To me, it is those whose reputations were belittled that achieved more during the reforms.
Reformers are idealists who fearlessly apply the
issue 3(2008-04-09 08:18)
In the recent decades, with the advent of science and technology, the information have dramatically accumlated and transported in almost every aspects of the world. However, instead of having a clearer vision of the world, people are even more confused, and unlike their ancientors who were in dilemma of information deficiency, but in dilusion of information.
issue 2(2008-04-08 08:22)
Generally, the formation of a man is rather complicated, just as the making of a world, or the rising of a country, since one individual is not as it appears to be one single entity, but a complex whole as a seemingly rudimental liquit probably contains several diverse resolutions. But what brings about such twisling humanity, or rather, where does this complication come from? Definitly, it is the environment defines it, but to what expand of milieu defines the humanity, is it the comparative small group like family, friends, teachers and like, or the society as a whole. To me, it is the society talks.
The society we live defines our believes, languages, as well as attitude, and costums. It is unbelievable to imagine a native African without any special education can dress like a traditional Chinese, tasting Chinese tea. Also, an ordinary Indian may not understand why people in Mid-east are so jealous on the occupation of the Holy City. Blo
argument 1(2008-04-07 15:23)
The claim appearingly true is actually, at least it seems to me, a parodox.
 
First, the proposer emphansized that the store gained most profits from the sale of sports products. But this reclaim is merely based on unstable previous experience, which could be more likely to be a coincedence. Therefore, the proclaimation and the following analysis are actually invalid.
 
Even if the previous experience are appliable, the claim of many residents in Plainsville are sports lovers may still be challenged. The auther simply refered the local sports paratuses are always full, but this may not prove that the locals are really sports-lovers, it can be a fashion or some kind of promotion. What's more, the almost-closed gym may ironically proves that there was some factors not mentioned.
 
Also, the fact of Plainsville's students are require to join in the 'fitness for life' program may as we
issue 1(2008-04-07 08:32)
 For the last three centuries, the world have changed a lot. In both oriental and occiental world, empirors been vanquished, hierarchy vanished, as well as the coming of science, freedom and  reforms. Question is who accomplished all of these, who gain the avalanche victories of everything. Is it those who are concerned with their own repuitations, intended to be more renowned according to processing a reform, or those who were willing to be viewed with disdain saw the corruption and dark side of the society, nobely acted on them and accidentaly be regarde as saints. To me, it is those whose reputations were belittled could be more acchieved during the reforms.
Reformer are idealists who fearlessly apply their ideals to reality, without regarding whether their own interested been challenged. When Martin Luther King was on the march of againsting racial discrim