加载中…
个人资料
sundig
sundig
  • 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:1,970
  • 关注人气:2
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
相关博文
推荐博文
正文 字体大小:

GW2 Gold  this wife involving wealthy Florentine dealer.

(2014-03-11 17:13:57)
标签:

gw2

gold

e

娱乐

'Early Mona Lisa' painting claim disputed
A basis in Europe believes these have scientific studies to establish that Leonardo Nr Vinci painted a tender version in the Mona Lisa. The Zurich-based Jewish bride by rembrandt Foundation claims the painting like a pro, discovered within 1913, portrays a new younger model of Leonardo's must-see in the Louvre. The framework is basing it is claim regarding 35 many years of research. But Oxford tutor Martin Kemp insists there is "no basis for convinced that there was an early on portrait". The portray, which has been held in a bank burial container for more than Four decades, was showcased to the media in Geneva at Thursday. Known since Isleworth Mona Lisa, typically the painting displays a woman that appears to be around 10 years smaller than the Louvre Jewish bride by rembrandt. The foundation claim forensic testing back early concepts that it is the same woman As Lisa del Giocondo, this wife involving wealthy Florentine dealer. Ever since the Sixteenth century, options have highly recommended that Idet Vinci painted not one but two versions from GW2 Gold the Mona Lisa: some portrait husband, on 1503 (the Isleworth Mona Lisa), and another, carried out 1517, for Giuliano delaware Medici, Leonardo's patron , the portrait which nowadays hangs inside the Louvre. The foundation says that historic evidence, fundamental comparison and scientific assessment all program this principle. The painting, known as the Isleworth Mona Lisa, was rediscovered in 1913 "Not single piece of scientific evidence has got so far had time to prove definitively that this is not a Leonardo Idet Vinci," explained foundation user and skill historian Stanley Feldman, on Wed. "We have perused this portrait from each individual relevant position and the gained information every point to it being an earlier version of La Giaconda [Mona Lisa] while in the Louvre." Still, the foundation known that the Isleworth Raft of madusa remains incomplete, and that Leonardo just didn't paint many parts of the give good results. The unveiling with the Isleworth Mona Lisa was initially accompanied by typically the launch of a book recognized as Mona Lisa And Leonardo's earlier variation. The painting was first discovered in your Somerset home of aristocrat, in 1913, simply by art collector Hugh Blaker - that took them to his / her studio throughout Isleworth in south-west Greater london. Shipped towards US for the duration of World War I, it was bought in 1960s by U . s art expert Henry Pulitzer. While in their possession, as well as held in a Europe bank, Pulitzer written and publicized a book, known as Where is your Mona Lisa?, in which he provided the case the painting ended up being an not finished portrait from Lisa del Giocondo through Leonardo Da Vinci. The painting them is currently actually owned by any anonymous consortium, making it ambiguous who would at this point benefit from this being due to the artist. Continue reading the biggest story“Start QuoteThe head off, like all other replications, does not collect the powerful elusiveness of the original”End QuoteProfessor Martin Kemp Alessandro Vezzosi, director for Museo Ideale Leonardo da Vinci, reported the foundation's cases merit "consideration". "The Isleworth Hireling shepherd is an important work of art deserving admiration and sound consideration, he said. "Scientific checks don't explain to you the credibility (and) this autography of a painting them, but indicate it's in GW2 Gold EU a certain days, whether the processes are similar this is," this individual told All the Associated Hit. But Tutor Kemp, who was a key player in distinguishing a major get the job done by Leonardo Nrrr Vinci in 2010, is normally convinced it is a copy - though fresh not i believe viewed typically the painting. "The Isleworth Raft of madusa mistranslates subtle details of the original, just as sitter's veil, her your hair, the transparent layer regarding her clothing, the structure of this hands,In he said. "The surfaces is without having atmospheric subtlety. Your head, like all other copies, does not collect the powerful elusiveness of the classic." Professor Kemp additionally points out that the Isleworth version is normally painted upon canvas, just where Da Vinci's favourite choice seemed to be wood. "The scientific analysis might, at most, suggest that there is nothing to imply that this should not be by Leonardo,In . said Mister Kemp. "The infrared reflectography and additionally X-ray points pretty strongly to its not increasingly being by Leonardo.In Stanley Feldman has regarded the a hot debate surrounding the particular painting, declaring: "There is always going to somebody, scattered who will dismiss it as a duplicate. "We welcome every last new topic and every completely new piece of studies that could help support this painting like a pro, one way or another.Inches
'Early Mona Lisa' painting profess disputed

0

阅读 评论 收藏 转载 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  • 评论加载中,请稍候...
发评论

    发评论

    以上网友发言只代表其个人观点,不代表新浪网的观点或立场。

      

    新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 电话:4000520066 提示音后按1键(按当地市话标准计费) 欢迎批评指正

    新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 会员注册 | 产品答疑

    新浪公司 版权所有