• 博客等级:
  • 博客积分:0
  • 博客访问:2,150
  • 关注人气:25
  • 获赠金笔:0支
  • 赠出金笔:0支
  • 荣誉徽章:
正文 字体大小:


(2011-09-04 19:27:11)










分类: 商业


Geology or geography?

Miners should spread their risks across countries as well as minerals


THE past half-dozen years have been kind to miners. China is gobbling up minerals as fast as they can dig them up. Commodity prices have surged, dipping only temporarily after the financial crisis of 2008. The doldrums of the 1990s are a distant memory. 
Well, almost. The share prices of big mining firms have wobbled in recent weeks, as jitters about the global economy have intensified. But profits are ballooning. On August 24th BHP Billiton, the world’s largest miner, unveiled record annual profits of $23.6 billion. Not long ago Rio Tinto, another Anglo-Australian giant, reported record profits for the first half of the year. The other big global miners—Vale, Xstrata and Anglo American—are raking in mammoth sums too. 
Investors should be celebrating. But Rio missed analysts’ forecasts and investors were quick to question the company’s strategy. Their main concern is that Rio earned nearly 80% of its profits from a single commodity: iron ore. That makes it vulnerable to price swings, and it is not alone. Vale, a Brazilian miner, gets a hefty 60% of its revenues from iron ore. And last year it sold most of its aluminium business, thus putting all its eggs in an iron basket. 
There are two theories as to how miners should spread their risks. One is that they should diversify by geology. That is, they should dig up lots of different minerals, just in case the price of one of them collapses. That was the thinking behind the mega-merger that created BHP Billiton in 2001. It also explains why Xstrata and Anglo American operate so many different kinds of mines. 
对于采矿业应如何分散风险,目前有两种理论。一种是地质上的分散: 矿业公司应该开发种类繁多的矿物,以防某一种矿物价格暴跌。这也正是促成必和必拓于2001年诞生的大规模兼并背后的逻辑,同时也解释了斯特拉塔和英美资源缘何运作多种矿产的业务。
A rival theory holds that miners should worry more about geographical diversity than the geological sort. Some analysts believe that because China’s appetite for minerals is growing so fast—it already consumes around two-fifths of the world’s output of industrial metals—prices can only go up. They talk of a “supercycle” of 20-25 years of high demand. 
与之相对的理论认为,采矿业更应该担心地理上的分散而不是地质上的。一些分析师相信,价格只会继续上扬:因为即使已经消费了大约世界2/5的产量,中国对矿产的需求增长依然强劲,他们称之为 20-25年高需求的“超周期”。
The big threat now is not that prices will fall but that governments will seek to grab a greater share of miners’ profits, predicts Grant Thornton, a consultancy. So miners should spread their political risk by digging in multiple countries. 
BHP is doing well by following the first theory. It wants to become a large supplier of potash, a base for fertilisers, and recently spent $12.1 billion on Petrohawk, an American shale-gas firm, to add to an energy business that already accounts for a fifth of its profits.
But the second theory is gaining followers. Several cash-strapped African governments are looking hungrily at miners’ bulging moneybags. Tanzanian politicians are mulling a supertax on miners. Namibia and Zimbabwe have plans for the “indigenisation” of mining assets—ie, forcing miners to sell or hand them over to locals. Peru’s new government pledged to levy a windfall tax, but has since agreed merely to negotiate a better deal for its treasury. 
Trouble can arise in unexpected places: in 2010 Australia’s government tried to impose a mining supertax. A campaign by big miners forced a climb down and cost the prime minister his job, but Australia will now slap a tax on iron ore and coal mining. 
Anglo American illustrates the dangers of geographical concentration. The firm was originally South African, but moved its headquarters to London in 1999. It still relies on South African assets for 40% of its profits, however. Whenever a South African politician talks about nationalisation, its shares react as if whacked with a shovel. One ruling-party firebrand talks of seizure without compensation. His views will probably not prevail, but Anglo is investing heavily in Latin America and elsewhere, just in case. 
Miners have so much cash that they are sure to splurge on further acquisitions. To guard against future adversity, they would be wise to seek both kinds of diversity. For political winds are as unpredictable as swings in commodity prices. 


原文:The Economist    翻译:巩子笠    校对:胡心云


阅读 评论 收藏 转载 喜欢 打印举报/Report
  • 评论加载中,请稍候...



    < 前一篇8.27效仿着IBM

    新浪BLOG意见反馈留言板 电话:4000520066 提示音后按1键(按当地市话标准计费) 欢迎批评指正

    新浪简介 | About Sina | 广告服务 | 联系我们 | 招聘信息 | 网站律师 | SINA English | 会员注册 | 产品答疑

    新浪公司 版权所有